Secrets of the First Moon Landing: All Nighters, Lost Footage, and a Ten Year Old to the Rescue
Posted by Alex_Pasternack on Friday, Jul 23, 2010
.
No, it wasn’t a hoax. Sheesh. But some of the details of Apollo 11’s remarkable journey to the Moon are stranger than fiction. I mean, it was the first time humans set foot on another celestial body.
- They pulled an all nighter. While the schedule for the mission called for the astronauts to follow the landing with a five-hour nap (they had been awake since early morning), they chose to forgo the sleep period and begin the preparations for their lunar excursion early, thinking that they would be unable to sleep.
- TV coverage of the landing was recorded from another TV The first landing used slow-scan television incompatible with commercial TV, so it was displayed on a special monitor at NASA, and a conventional TV camera viewed this monitor, significantly reducing the quality of the picture. (This has helped fuel the notion that the Moon landing was a hoax.) Despite technical and weather difficulties, ghostly black and white images of the first moon walk were broadcast to at least 600 million people on Earth.
- The tapes of the moon landing were lost Although copies of the video in broadcast format are widely available, recordings of the original slow scan source transmission from the moon were accidentally destroyed during routine magnetic tape re-use at NASA, as was a backup that existed at Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station in Australia. The erasure has provided yet more fodder for the myth makers. Last year, NASA issued its final report on the tapes
- They had to squeeze through the hatch Armstrong’s Portable Life Support System (PLSS) made it hard for him to exit the lander, which included a smaller hatch than the astronauts had practiced with (the backpack was later redesigned). Some of the highest heart rates recorded from Apollo astronauts occurred when they were getting in and out of the lander.
- The Soviets landed there a few days before The unmanned Luna 15 Soviet spacecraft began its own descent to the lunar surface just a few hours before the Apollo 11 liftoff -and crashed. This was widely seen as the climax of the Space Race, but also a moment of unusual cooperation: the USSR released Luna 15’s flight plan to ensure it would not collide with Apollo 11, though its exact mission was unknown.
- Armstrong was moving fast As time was running out, Mission Control used a coded phrase to warn the mission commander that his metabolic rates were high and that he should slow down. But as metabolic rates remained generally lower than expected for both astronauts, Mission Control granted the astronauts a 15-minute extension.
- Buzz broke the engine circuit breaker While moving within the cabin of the lunar module, Aldrin accidentally broke the circuit breaker that would arm the main engine for lift off from the moon, potentially leaving them stranded there. Fortunately a felt-tip pen was enough to activate the switch. If this hadn’t worked, the Lunar Module circuitry could have been reconfigured to allow firing the ascent engine.
- They left behind a list of Congressmen Along with a plaque and a memorial bag containing a gold replica of an olive branch, the astronauts left behind a silicon message disk. It carried the goodwill statements by Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon and messages from leaders of 73 countries around the world, as well as a listing of the leadership of the US Congress, a listing of members of the four committees of the House and Senate responsible for the NASA legislation, and the names of NASA’s past and present top management. They also left behind Soviet medals commemorating Cosmonauts Vladimir Komarov and Yuri Gagarin. Just before climbing back into the lunar module, Armstrong reminded Aldrin of a bag of memorial items in his suit pocket sleeve, and Aldrin tossed the bag down.
- The flag fell over As the astronauts lifted off the lunar surface, film shows the flag whipping violently in the exhaust of the ascent stage engine. Buzz Aldrin saw it topple. Subsequent Apollo missions usually planted the American flags at least 100 feet from the LM to prevent its being blown over by the exhaust from the ascent engine.
- Nixon was prepared to bury them on the Moon In the event of a catastrophic failure that would leave Aldrin and Armstrong on the Moon, William Safire, President Nixon’s speechwriter, drafted a plan to be followed. Mission Control was to “close down communications” with the Lunar Module. In a public ritual likened to burial at sea, clergyman would then have commended their souls to “the deepest of the deep.” Presidential telephone calls to the astronauts’ wives were also planned. The speech (which we covered here) began, “Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace.”
- A ten year old kept Apollo in touch After a fairly smooth docking procedure, the three astronauts began their return to Earth. But along the way, the Guam tracking station failed, which would have made communication on the last segment of the Earth return difficult. A staff member had his ten-year old son, Greg Force, do repairs that were made possible by his small hands.
Read more about Apollo 11 and NASA’s future on Motherboard.
About the author
Alex_Pasternack
I'm a free... bit
New York, United States
Member since 2009
Brooklyn. Writer. Things.
Sounding Board Leaders
A Sounding Board leader is someone who is driving the conversation forward in any given Discussion.
The first step to becoming a Sounding Board leader is to post the best content.
You must be a member to comment on Alex_Pasternack’s post.
Login or register here
griffinaero about 1 month ago
Consider the advantages of subsurface lunar habitat: Protection from meteors, radiation, solar storms, and temperature extremes. The overburden will allow whatever sized spaces desired to be built without air pressure buildup concerns. The habitats could be every bit as pleasant as the huge malls we have here. The development of this new frontier will provide meaningful jobs for generations, paid for by the titanium, heavy hydrogen and helium from stored solar wind, etc. that are landed in areas like Edwards AFB. Slag could be used for the heat shields needed by the transit ships. What can we possibly GET from Mars? Dreams don't open wallets.
WaggyWow about 1 month ago
OH wow, OK that really does make a lot of sense. www.post-anonymously.at.tc
griffinaero about 1 month ago
The atmosphere of Mars is a hindrance, as it is too thin to effectively support flying machines and is toxic CO2, blows dust around and makes launches difficult. The Moon, without an atmosphere, allows rail-launches of cargo to be slung off to Earth. If you look at the elements available there that can be vaporized out of the regolith with solar energy and condensed in the vacuum with purity unmatched in an atmosphere, you can see the profit possibilities that would tempt businesses to invest. Taxpayer money will be needed for only a short time. Thanks to idiot Bush the United States is losing the initiative and will likely go the way of Portugal and Spain, the new frontier slipping through our fingers.
Joop about 1 month ago
So your reason for moving to the moon is for mining and manufacturing, rather than a place for the species to survive as you previously mentioned? That makes a bit more sense, as a self sustaining moon colony is a little bit silly at the moment. Regardless the whole idea of the space race relying on countries rather than private interests is sort of a bit old. More and more corporations and enterprising people are leading the way into space, rather than the good old stand by of 'Our country has to get there before your country' which has almost run its course. The only reason NASA has continued to exist as an entity is because to shut down the space program your eliminating a hell of a lot of jobs in many industries (lost votes during your next election) and for fear of losing out in any sort of weaponisation/occupation of orbit, countries are yet to work out how to make a profit out there, and the way they are going at the moment this will continue to be the case. Besides if your after easy launches and access to some decent mining real estate why get bogged down in the difficulties inherent in the moon? The whole place is inundated in fine dust that tends to cling to everything it touches, not very useful for any sort of high-tech manufacturing or refining. Grab some asteroids from the MAB push them into orbit and you have some very nice micro-g refining opportunities.
griffinaero about 1 month ago
Why the preoccupation with Mars? It has NOTHING to offer except trouble. The Moon, on the other hand, can provide resources of value PLUS BE A PLACE FOR OUR SPECIES TO SURVIVE should a global catastrophe occur. A self-sustaining settlement on the Moon would ensure the survival of our species forever (not necessarily a good idea, perhaps, considering what a rotten life-form we are).
Joop about 1 month ago
Im sorry but.....what? How would a Moon colony be preferable to a Martian Colony in anything but the fact that its closer and using its lower gravity as a stepping stone for launches? There are few 'resources of value' on the moon and survival on the moon would HEAVILY depend on support from Earth. What do you mean by Mars being nothing but trouble anyway?
Comments 1 - 6 of 6